Regarding tie-breakers, I would prefer if all sets had remained advantage (as are the fifth sets at Wimbledon). Without question, advantage sets are more demanding, both mentally and physically, than tie-breakers, which is why I like them.
But I can appreciate some players preference for tie-breakers, particularly those who have big serves and those who tend to tire easily. I also appreciate that tie-breakers are better suited to meet television requirements.
Over the years, and more so recently, there has been much talk about changing the rules to slow the game down. Another issue that often comes up is whether to allow on-court coaching during changes of end.
In fact, the ATP Tour, one of the game's three governing bodies, has decided to allow a limited amount of on-court coaching, on a trial basis only, at some major professional events on the men's tour this year*.
This is an appalling development. One of the greatest appeals of tennis is that it demands from players the ability to think quickly when under pressure.
Relying on someone else to do that thinking flies right in the face of what an individual sport demands, or should demand, from every player. It strikes at the heart of what tennis is all about.
While it may be a very popular idea with coaches, as it presents all sorts of profile-lifting opportunities for them, I cannot imagine any intelligent player supporting a move that negates, to any extent whatsoever, a superior ability to out-think an opponent.
But that is exactly the point -- the beauty of the game is that you are completely alone out on court, facing a player who is equally alone (which is why it is called "singles"). In order to preserve the appeal that tennis has to the independent thinkers and to the very integrity of the game, that aspect of the game should remain sacrosanct.
Sure, in a team situation such as Davis Cup play, it is absolutely appropriate to have input from a coach or captain, who is every bit part of the team as the players. But it is absolutely inappropriate to allow coaching during individual tournament play.
After the three month trial period, I sincerely hope the ATP Tour decides against continuing something that never should have been allowed in the first place.
Chris Lewis (16 May, 1998)
*After the trial period, during which players were almost unanimous in their opposition to the rule change, the ATP Tour
wisely decided to scrap the idea.
Please feel free to publish this article on your own website, as long as you provide a link back to http://www.expert-tennis-tips.com and give credit to the author.
Other Tennis Articles by Chris Lewis:
Are Tennis Champions Born? -- Or Made?
Sorry Pete, But That's No Sacrifice
Wimbledon Center Court: What An Experience
Tennis Parents: "The Ugly Parent Syndrome"
A National Junior Development Program Disaster
Harry Hopman: A Tennis Legend
Vitas Gerulaitis: Rest In Peace
Tennis Marketing: Substance Versus Image
Other Articles by Chris Lewis:
A Tribute to Maria Montessori -- An Article on Child Education
Suzuki and Montessori Versus Today's Culture
More Tennis Articles:
Mental Toughness - by Tomaz Mencinger
Tennis Psychology - by Tomaz Mencinger
Tennis Shoes History - By Cheri Britton
Womens Tennis Apparel - By Cheri Britton
The Wimbledon Trophy -- A History - By Miguel Seabra
Doubles Tennis Strategy - By Kathy Krajco
Home | About Us | Junior Tennis | Apparel | Footwear | Camps | Jewelry | Equipment
Scholarships | Tennis Elbow | Training | Strokes | Tips | Links | Blog | Contact Us | Site Map
Copyright © 2005-2006. Expert-Tennis-Tips.com. All Rights Reserved.
Website Redesigned by WeBuildWebSites4u